Abstract
Apart from the pragmatic , the performative , and the existentialist theorie s of truth, the correspondence theory and the coherence theory of truth are of special importance in any discussion about scientific truth. The Christian scholars Ceisler and Feinberg are q u o ted as proponents of the correspondence theory, and Botha as a proponent of the coherence theory. None of them seem to take sifficiently into account the essential distinction between the practical and the theoretical attitude of thought, nor do they discuss the difference between the two theories of them within the framework of a Christian cosmology and episiemology. Therefore, the distinction between Biblical and theological knowledge is briefly discussed, as well as the scientism inherent in the fundamentalistic preference of the correspondence theory. It is argued, however, that the same danger of scientism threatens Botha's preference of the weak criterion of truth of the coherence theory. Finally, Botha ’s preference of the relational concept of truth is criticized because of its false distinction between the relational an d the objective and subjective. Here, too, a consistent Christian cosmology and epistemology could be helpful.Copyright information
- Ownership of copyright in terms of the Work remains with the authors.
- The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the Work, provided attribution is given to the place and detail of original publication, as set out in the official citation of the Work published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the Work on the authors’ or their institutions’ websites or institutional repositories.
Publication and user license
- The authors grant the title owner and the publisher an irrevocable license and first right and perpetual subsequent right to (a) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Work in any form/medium, (b) to translate the Work into other languages, create adaptations, summaries or extracts of the Work or other derivative works based on the Work and exercise all of the rights set forth in (a) above in such translations, adaptations, summaries, extracts and derivative works, (c) to license others to do any or all of the above, and (d) to register the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for the Definitive Work.
- The authors acknowledge and accept the user licence under which the Work will be published as set out in https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (Creative Commons Attribution License South Africa)
- The undersigned warrant that they have the authority to license these publication rights and that no portion of the copyright to the Work has been assigned or licensed previously to any other party.
Disclaimer: The publisher, editors and title owner accept no responsibility for any statement made or opinion expressed by any other person in this Work. Consequently, they will not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by any reader as a result of his or her action upon any statement or opinion in this Work.
In cases where a manuscript is NOT accepted for publication by the editorial board, the portions of this agreement regarding the publishing licensing shall be null and void and the authors will be free to submit this manuscript to any other publication for first publication.
Our copyright policies are author-friendly and protect the rights of our authors and publishing partners.