Abstract
The dark side of the Enlightenment
The complex concept “Enlightenment" was ambiguous, even in the time of its inception in the 18th century. As such, it was ambivalent, revealing a dialectical tension between rational-irrational, and Christian-antichristian. The sunny face of the Age of Reason is well known: its rational, scientific, and "Christian" side. Its other side - dark, irrational, and antichristian - is less often explicated While mentioning aspects of its irrationalism, its antichristian character forms the focal point of this article. The Enlightenment was "Christian" in the sense of formulating Christian truth simply a little more "rationally"; yet "antichristian” in the sense of trading in Christianity for classical culture. Voltaire is called as a witness to this tension, and especially to the antichristian nature of this epoch. Since the rise of the Enlightenment Protestant churches in particular have displayed a disturbing openness towards this movement, embracing its (essentially antichristian) scientific ideals to promote Christian truth. The results of this impossible synthesis are seen, among others, in the tension between theological lecture room (reason) and pulpit (faith), and in the Western churches' (often) uncertain witness to Biblical truth. The dead end in which the mainstream liberal Enlightenment theology finds itself, is illustrated by the contradictory statements of theologians during the past fo u r decades about angels - statements which incurred the contempt of natural scientists like Tipler, Weinberg and Feynman. To see the dark side of the Enlightenment is a challenge to believers (including theologians) to reconsider their allegiance to its scientific ideals and to rethink their position as witnesses to the truth, which is in Christ.
Copyright information
- Ownership of copyright in terms of the Work remains with the authors.
- The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the Work, provided attribution is given to the place and detail of original publication, as set out in the official citation of the Work published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the Work on the authors’ or their institutions’ websites or institutional repositories.
Publication and user license
- The authors grant the title owner and the publisher an irrevocable license and first right and perpetual subsequent right to (a) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Work in any form/medium, (b) to translate the Work into other languages, create adaptations, summaries or extracts of the Work or other derivative works based on the Work and exercise all of the rights set forth in (a) above in such translations, adaptations, summaries, extracts and derivative works, (c) to license others to do any or all of the above, and (d) to register the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for the Definitive Work.
- The authors acknowledge and accept the user licence under which the Work will be published as set out in https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (Creative Commons Attribution License South Africa)
- The undersigned warrant that they have the authority to license these publication rights and that no portion of the copyright to the Work has been assigned or licensed previously to any other party.
Disclaimer: The publisher, editors and title owner accept no responsibility for any statement made or opinion expressed by any other person in this Work. Consequently, they will not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by any reader as a result of his or her action upon any statement or opinion in this Work.
In cases where a manuscript is NOT accepted for publication by the editorial board, the portions of this agreement regarding the publishing licensing shall be null and void and the authors will be free to submit this manuscript to any other publication for first publication.
Our copyright policies are author-friendly and protect the rights of our authors and publishing partners.